Twitter Investigation
For my twitter investigation I decided to analyse a
selection of tweets from one male and one female account. 
For this investigation I can apply the deficit theory, this
states that women have more air time that is filled with many things such as empty
adjectives, tag questions, more emotive language , filler etc.
I decided to collect data from five of one woman’s tweets at
random and five of one male tweets at random also and analysed the amount of technology
in the tweets such as video links an emojis.
Emojis could be seen as a new version of the deficit theory
as the emojis convey emotions and can be seen as a form of a weak communication.
Methodology:
To make sure this investigation isn’t bias I selected every
5th tweet to collect m pool of data from.
I found from my data that the female has 12 cases of using
technology whereas the male only uses 5, I also analysed the word count the
female had a count of 76 whereas the mal significantly less with 35. Finally the
last thing I counted was the number of nonstandard English used in the tweets,
females used 2 and males used 7. However this data may not be as reliable as to
make this information relevant we could have measured whether these cases were
in the form of being creative/ on purpose for effect or by accident.
From this data we can conclude that our hypothesis is
correct as women use more emotions through the use of technology, however this
may just be in proportion to the word count which is higher than the males. 16%
of women’s tweets contained technology as a source  to demonstrate their emotions whereas in 14%
of males tweets contained technology so in relation to the word count there isn’t
much significant difference in the data. 
Good evaluative approach; some subtle points made - more exploration of the context of individual uses needed and more consideration of reliability of those language users as representative of their gender (do you know them to even know if their persona reflects their actual gender?).
ReplyDelete